Our online debt consolidation and credit card counseling service is here to help you eliminate your outstanding debts, reduce interest rates, lower your monthly payments and avoid bankruptcy.

Debt consolidation is the process of consolidating multiple debts into one low interest loan or credit card. Debt consolidation typically involves a new credit line, but could also be referred to you as a credit counseling program or other forms of debt management that do not involve a debt consolidation loan. If you have a lot of debt and want to get some relief, there are a variety of options that may be available to you. Our experienced debt counselors can assist you to evaluate your options and find the debt consolidation solution that is right for your personal situation so that you can get out of debt fast. read more...

The two claimants whose matter in New York took place before Judge Drain in March asserted they had been harmed by credit references that hadn’t been correctly updated. Yvette R. Torres and Ariadna Mateo had been under an obligation to pay Chase a sum of $7,674 on 3 credit-card accounts. Their

debt

s were liquidated several years ago during legal procedures under Chapter 7 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. The tree accounts went on to emerge on their credit references as if they were valid, that’s why Torres and Mateo decided to sue Chase.

In accordance with a hearing record the judge said he was mistrustful about the reason why Chase failed to correct the references when it got standard court notifications of the liquidations. The judge supposed that Chase might have been making attempts to use the wrong credit references as a method to force the

debt

ors to repay the liquidated

debt

. “The single consideration why Chase could sell it is because some people thought they could recover it.”

On May 3, Chase’s petition to discard the main suit by Torres and Mateo was rejected by Judge Drain. “The main point of the claimants’ declarations is that Chase has went on to set a pitfall for them waiting for the day they need a correct credit reference,” the judge pointed out in a written decree of the court. “If such behavior is proven during a legal procedure it would be rather disappointing and depressing to maintain at least sanctions in the total of claimants’ expenses and costs incurred in remitting the pitfall.” A trial date hasn’t been fixed.

Rejecting any infringement, Chase has admitted in court documentations that it didn’t attempt to recover

debt

s wrongly and that it had no lawful obligation to correct the credit references. In a declaration prepared Chase spokeslady Tanya Madison explains that the creditor commonly “doesn’t try to recover a

debt

after we get to know that the account is involved in an insolvency applying. “ Credit reporting agency is informed by chase that an account is “subject to insolvency” during the period of 60 days from the moment the creditor gets to know of an insolvency applying, Madison adds. She rejects to make any comments on Chase’s selling of liquidated

debt

s or on any legal case.

The secondary marketplace in insolvency documents as other judges caution is indulging indecent recovery operations that raise possible cost of that

debt

. William R. Sawyer, a U.S. bankruptcy judge in Montgomery, Ala., admits that in the past couple of years he has come across a growth in matters asserting that creditors and

debt

traders have deliberately ignored to inform credit reporting agencies about the liquidation of

debt

. He says that this trick is a “concealed means” of forcing customers to repay

debt

s they no longer legally owe. “Collector and lenders are moving possibly close to the law and actually making attempts to decrease its importance.”